When a couple with children separates, the issue of child custody—legally referred to as the child’s residence—becomes a key matter to resolve.
This article provides a simplified overview of the principles and rules that govern custody decisions in family law.

1. The Guiding Principle: The Best Interests of the Child

The primary standard in all custody decisions is the best interests of the child.
This means that the child’s well-being—considering their personal and family circumstances—always takes priority.

The judge must ensure the child can grow up in the best possible conditions, taking into account emotional, educational, and material needs.

 2. Types of Custody Arrangements

In the event of separation, the Family Court Judge may choose among several custody options:

    • Shared custody (alternating residence): The child lives alternately with each parent on a regular and balanced schedule—such as one week with each parent. This arrangement is considered if it serves the child’s best interests and if the parents live close to each other.
    • Sole custody with visitation rights: The child resides primarily with one parent, while the other parent has visitation and overnight access (e.g., weekends or school holidays).
    • Custody by a third party: In exceptional cases, where neither parent is able to provide suitable care, the judge may assign custody to a third party, such as grandparents or another trusted individual.

 3. The Role of the Family Court Judge

The Family Court Judge (juge aux affaires familiales) is responsible for making custody decisions when parents cannot reach an agreement.

The judge considers several factors, including:

    • Each parent’s ability to respect the rights of the other parent and to cooperate in the child’s best interests.
    • The child’s specific needs, including relationships with siblings, school situation, and emotional environment.
    • Any agreements between the parents, which the judge may either approve (by issuing a court order) or override, if necessary.

 4. Visitation and Parenting Time

The parent with whom the child does not primarily reside is generally granted visitation and parenting time, unless doing so would be contrary to the child’s best interests.

This right can be exercised:

    • By mutual agreement between the parents.
    • According to a fixed schedule set by the judge (e.g., every other weekend and half of school vacations).
    • In a supervised visitation setting, if necessary to ensure the child’s safety.

 5. Special Circumstances

In some situations, specific measures may be ordered:

    • Sole parental authority: If the child’s best interests require it, the judge may grant exclusive parental authority to one parent.
    • Social inquiry or psychological evaluation: The judge may request a social investigation or psychological assessment to better understand the child’s needs and assess each parent’s capacity before deciding on custody arrangements.

 6. Penalties for Non-Compliance

If a parent fails to comply with the court’s decision (e.g., refusing to hand over the child), consequences may include:

    • Criminal sanctions: Such conduct may constitute the offense of child abduction or violation of custody orders, punishable by law.
    • Civil sanctions: The judge may impose a daily fine (astreinte) to compel the parent to comply with the judgment.

 Conclusion

In summary, custody decisions are guided by well-established principles centered on the child’s best interests.
The judge’s role is to ensure that each parent fulfills their responsibilities, while preserving the child’s stability and well-being.

However, as each situation is unique, decisions are made on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the child’s specific needs and the parents’ abilities.